Development Blog

4.

1 or 4

none of the above... sorry...

 

--Mike

3. But I would like to compare them in higher resolutions. I'd also like to see what other artists can do with it.

Depend on the style of the dungeon, but i would say 3.

3 .But ,you can try to increase Contrast little bit,to improve readability .

These are images from years ago. They aren't meant to be final logos, just concepts. Most of them are too blurry to read clearly.

 

I kind of like them all.

3, I like the wood look.

A OK, No 3 looks great.

3. It looks like the most refined.

I like 3, but I think it would look better if the letters were blackened like they were burned in.

3 if you can make it very readable, else 4.

Logo: 3

 

By the way Josh, I applaud the idea of shipping a game with the engine. Its really the best manual you can create.

By the way Josh, I applaud the idea of shipping a game with the engine. Its really the best manual you can create.

 

yes... i second that...

 

--Mike

I'd very much would not wanna see finished game demo with the shipped product if this delays shipping (and to my understanding, it will)

 

2 months after release, with some major bug fixes done... then I applaud the idea of shipping a game demo with the engine 8)

 

But to answer to your question, 3 or 4.

What if we beat you to this demo game in LE2

I'm with you, GP but Josh is WAAAAY faster than we are. Funny idea Rick. Wish we could help Josh with the game but we can't, for several reasons.

If there's no finished documented game, even a simple one, then there's no product.

If there's no finished documented game, even a simple one, then there's no product.

 

So LE2 doesn't exist?! Lies, all my life?

none...maybe three if i have to choose.

I guess this boils down to defining "simple one".

 

I never needed one when working with LE2. Tech demo + tutorials would be more than sufficient.

 

I do understand want for doing complete game, but it will delay the LE3D product launch (by definition: if you work on game, you are not working on the engine)

 

Not going to argue about this one, but would really hope to see this re-considered... if "simple" means bit like tech demo with documented examples, that sounds relatively ok...

Also, I think asking forum chaps to provide short game demos featuring some functionality might go a long way. I'm pretty certain there's folks here who would be interested in adding short example code in the side of the LE3D.

3

3