L B

That first buggy tearpot image is pure art.

Actually, S-M-A-T would fit the situation better: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMART_criteria

Here are some from Dexsoft packs I own: Diffuse: _diff, _DF, _col Normal: _nmap, Normal, N, _normal_map Specular: Spec, S Opacity: _OP, _Alpha Height (/Parallax): _H, H, _height_map

We would be doomed. Skynet is nothing compared to iOS.

And how C# is supported.

That means I'll be the one maintaining the VS2010 C# project for .NET 4, I guess. But think of all the functions that have optional parameters in L3D. You can't have that with VS2008 C#. EDIT: You can make overloaded functions with less parameters, of course, but it's annoying, long and useless when you could use the proper technology.

Dang. Should've seen this one coming.

Ok, yes, we get your point: Developers might not be able to add the redist to an installer Users might not be able to correctly install said redist Now here's the counter-argument: Don't settle for old technologies, you'll be switching in 6 months anyway. And that's probably before the official release date of L3D, so it really might be worth considering. Also, did I mention C# and .NET 4 require VS2010? This means language improvements that C# coders have started using regularly, like optional parameters, that Leadwerks wouldn't support. And if you're worried about the installers, make a distribution guide or whatnot. An example NSIS script. It really can't be hard to figure out once and then put in the distro.

Here's my grain of salt for VS2010: C# and .NET 4 require it. Period.

Here's some attempt. Ignore the ugly header. Josh said this is too far from the IPB code so not viable, but I still like it. I wish Werkspace looked this clean.

Web 2.0 is a marketing term. HTML5 is a technical term. @Josh: I guess it all falls within the radius of your rounded corner, heh?

Bubbly is the style nowadays? No, bubbly is "Web 2.0" and all the buzz words you may associate with it. The web isn't glossy bubbles anymore, it evolved to be cleaner, flatter, and more content oriented. Look at the redesigns over at Google - Gmail, YouTube, G+, even Google itself. Look at Vimeo, Twitter. Show me the bubbles. I don't dislike the presented design, it's good, but if it's not modernized it won't last for as many years as you'd wish.

I'll make them, if Josh agrees on the maintainability aspect.

Cookie Engine. CookE.

So LE2 doesn't exist?! Lies, all my life?

Seal of approval? How do I get it?!

The more I read, the less I like any of them.

Erhm, remember this is the Leadwerks3D forum, not LE2!

That would mean Leadwerks3D to support WebGL, that is, web browsers, am I right? I'd tend to say it's impossible at first, judging by the risky nature of executing a DLL, but I'm mighty curious how Unity does it. They do have a web player install though, right? In that case, you'd have to make plugins for these browsers, I think that'd be the simplest way.

+1

Yummy.

Would it be repetitive to say "Yummy."? Except for that cheesy music, of course.

I get the System::AddHook method. The first line was the definition, and the second an example, right? What I don't understand is the ProcessEvent method. Also, I suggest Application instead of App. First, App is connotated with iOS applications, or at least Mac applications, which is not platform neutral. Second, the engine doesn't use other abbreviations elsewhere, except when extremely often used (e.g. Vec for Vector).

Yummy.

Oh lory, I thought I was in the C# forum, and now I'm assaulted with pointers. I must have gotten lost!